![]() Using your own distro does mean building it yourself, you know? Are you using a commercial distro, in which case things should work as is? If you are using a DIY distro then you’ll have to look into the screensaver issues etc. Saying it is buggy isn’t really good enough. Kate has issues and Kdegraphics was looking pretty sorry. ![]() Unfortunately, I too have found it to be buggy. In short I would prefer quality of quantity! ![]() It tries to get the next version out the door by a pre-determined day, and it’s usually full of bugs that could have been easily caught with just a bit more time (ie: the LG CDROMS that would fail during the install of Mandrake 9.2 In XMMS the background/foreground colours for the playlist editor were the same colour with no easy way to change them) For the most part I find that this has made Mozilla/Firefox/Thunderbird very stable and fast. team does not care if they have not met their release dates. I belIEve that something will eventually break by just trying to get it out the door in time.įor Instance: Mozilla releases updates based upon if the build meets their requirements, and the Moz. I would much rather have KDE release cycles based on milestones ( fix ‘x’ number of bugs and add ‘x’ number of new features ) rather than base on a release date. Although I’m excitd that there is a new release of KDE I am concerned that the release cycle will create problems.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |